$WIGLET

The index has not attributed an ETH-quoted pool to this token, so there is no pool to read a tape from. That is a statement about our index, not about whether this token trades.

• · V4 depth is UNMEASURED, not zero: V4's PoolManager is a singleton holding every pool's tokens in one contract balance, so per-pool reserves cannot be read as balances. We say so rather than guess.
• · Volume is the 24h ETH leg the chainwide index attributed to each pool — a floor over what its per-tick budget could walk, never a lifetime total. Share divides by $WIGLET's 24h ETH across all 1 of its pools, not just the rows listed.

last 24h 0 ETH added over 0 events · 0 ETH left the pools over 0 movements (V3 collects and V2 burns — the two ways tokens actually leave a pool contract). Floors over the pools and blocks we walked, not a census.

No liquidity event has been indexed for $WIGLET inside the blocks we walked. Read the coverage line above before treating that as calm: it is the absence of an observation over a bounded window, not evidence that nothing moved.

• Every row is a log we decoded, stamped with the block it came from. This panel states what moved, when, and who signed for it — it does not label a removal, and it never will. Taking liquidity out is an ordinary operation; the reader draws the conclusion from the numbers and the times.
• V3 splits a removal in two: closed is the burn, which only credits what the position is owed, and withdrawn is the collect, where the tokens actually leave the pool. A collect carries accrued fees as well as principal and the event does not separate them, so we do not either. V2 does not split: a V2 removed transferred in the same call, with no collect to wait for, which is why the summary counts it as ETH that left rather than as principal credited.
• Percentages are deliberately absent. “80% of the liquidity left” needs the depth before the removal, and we hold depth only as a live read at one block — no history to divide by. The absolute amounts above are what we actually measured.

• · Every row is the account that SIGNED the swap transaction — never the router the trade was routed through. (Measured while building this: every swap-event “sender” in a live window was a contract; a board of those would be a list of routers.)
• · Totals cover ONLY the indexed window: 87 swaps attributed for $WIGLET between 2026-08-06 03:07Z and 2026-08-06 03:15Z — at least 13% of the 632 swaps our volume index counted over the same hours. Attribution is budgeted per tick and takes the highest-value blocks first, so every figure here is a floor over a stated period, never a lifetime total.
• · ETH in and ETH out are shown separately because net alone cannot tell “never sold” from “round-tripped”.
• · An account signing on others' behalf (a keeper, a relayer) appears as one signer. The “tokens” column is shown so bot- and infrastructure-shaped accounts are visible rather than silently ranked as people.

• · These strings were written into the token contract by whoever deployed it, and some of what is above came from our index rather than from this request — each part says which. Anyone can deploy a contract and write anything into it. A link here is not evidence that the account, site or person it points to has anything to do with $WIGLET — we do not check, we do not ask them, and we never follow the link to see where it lands.
• · A link tagged post, not account points at one specific page rather than a profile. On this chain that is routinely a link to somebody else's post: on 2026-08-06, six unrelated tokens linked the same tweet by Uniswap's founder. It is a fact about the URL, not about who wrote the post.
• · Read them yourself: the contract on the explorer ↗

• · The walk only NOMINATES wallets; every percentage above is a balanceOf read, exact at the block it was taken. Balances were read live across blocks 30,193,967–30,193,982 — this chain produces about ten blocks a second, so this is a short span, not a pinned snapshot.
• · These are FLOORS, not totals. Candidate discovery covered the last 120,000 blocks (about 3.3 hours), not full history — a wallet that has not moved $WIGLET inside that window is missing from the count. A missing wallet can only push the real figures UP, never down: the shares shown are measured, the set they are measured over is incomplete.
• · Circulating supply = total supply − the burn address's balance (that is the “burned” figure above, subtracted once) − the balances of 0x8366…0951 Uniswap V4 PoolManager — the singleton holding every V4 pool's tokens. Pools quoted against something other than WETH are not discovered by this read and so are not excluded — such a pool's liquidity would appear here as a holder.
• · Separately, 0x0000…0000 the zero address — mints come from here, 0x0000…dEaD the burn address are skipped when RANKING wallets, so a mint source or a burn can never appear as a holder. The zero address is skipped from that ranking only — its balance is NOT part of the subtraction above, so a token that sends supply to 0x0…0000 instead of the burn address still has that supply counted as circulating here.
• · This is the identical read, over the identical exclusion set, that /scan/0xE0fA…4E79 uses — the same engine, the same window, the same exclusion set. A figure in the down colour has crossed the level /scan raises its ALARM tone at (top holder 50%, top 10 80%); it marks that threshold, nothing more. /scan additionally raises a lower-tone flag from 25% (top holder) and 60% (top 10) — this panel does not tint those, so read the numbers rather than the colour. These are measurements, not a verdict: no threshold here makes a token safe or unsafe, and one wallet holding a large share may be a locker, a bridge, a treasury, or one person.