reading this token's identity and market
reading this token's identity and market
Ticker, name and decimals come from the index's read of the contract. Any token can claim any name, including one already in use by another: eight different addresses on this chain answer “RedBull”. Nothing here is a check on who wrote it — that is what the safety scan is for.
No swaps for this token were indexed in the window we queried — from 2026-08-06 09:24 UTC to now. That is a fact about the window, not about the token: it may have traded before that, before the index started, or on a venue this walker does not cover.
Partial history. This series begins where our index window opened — 2026-08-05 17:29 UTC, not at this token's first trade. Highs and lows are the extremes WE measured, never all-time.
Prices are from indexed Uniswap swaps in a single pool, in ETH per token. Prices are per pool, never averaged — an averaged cross-pool price is a number that never traded anywhere.
Quiet spans render as gaps: a missing bar means no swap with a derivable price was indexed for that bucket on this pool. Bars are never interpolated. Volume bars are the ETH leg of the indexed swaps in each bucket.
Index last advanced 2026-08-07 09:23 UTC.
no ETH-quoted Uniswap pool (V2, V3 or V4) for this token has been seen since the index window opened.
showingthe busiest of this token's pools, chosen for you — the default pick
chart pool: the busiest pool, chosen for youreading this token's pools…
reading this pool's swap logs…
Volume is the ETH leg of Uniswap V2, V3 and V4 swaps indexed since the disclosed start time — a floor, not an all-time figure. Age is when we first saw a POOL, not when the token was created. Holders are not counted here; they are measured on the scan, where the exclusion rules are stated. Tokens on this board are not endorsed, reviewed or affiliated, most new tokens on this chain go to zero, and nothing here is advice.
reading what the token contract publishes about itself…
reading the trader index…
reading the pool index and snapshotting depth…
walking Transfer logs to nominate wallets, then reading their balances…
reading the liquidity-event index…
The index has not attributed an ETH-quoted pool to this token, so there is no pool to read a tape from. That is a statement about our index, not about whether this token trades.
| V4 0xae12…9b8c |
| 838.86% |
| n/a |
24h ETH leg per pool. “n/a” is a pool with no ETH side — its swaps are counted, and no ETH figure is invented for it. The chart and the tape open on the single pool with the most indexed swaps; prices are per pool and are never averaged.
No swaps have been attributed to a signer for $SPY yet. Trader attribution covers only the window since it was switched on, and only what its per-tick budget could read — so this is a statement about our coverage, not about whether anyone is trading. The chart and volume above come from a separate, older measurement.
written by the token contract · unverified · not fletch's words
description — unread
links — unread
| pool | fee | age | vol 24h | share | depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V4 0xae12…9b8c · no ETH side | dyn | 8h | n/a | — | unmeasured — V4 singleton |
last 24h 0 ETH added over 0 events · 0 ETH left the pools over 0 movements (V3 collects and V2 burns — the two ways tokens actually leave a pool contract). Floors over the pools and blocks we walked, not a census.
No liquidity event has been indexed for $SPY inside the blocks we walked. Read the coverage line above before treating that as calm: it is the absence of an observation over a bounded window, not evidence that nothing moved.
We could not measure holder distribution for $SPY: our node did not answer, so no holder read was attempted. Nothing is claimed about this token's distribution. No percentage is shown, because a failed read of ours must never render as a number about someone else's token.