fletch_

$SFN

sixfignig
0xE341D08DcFF2341048d717519006948C219FD210explorer ↗
No alarms from the checks we ran. That is not a clean bill of health — it means these specific checks found nothing, and every one of them can be defeated by a contract written to defeat it.
trades on
none in scanned window
sell simulation
not run
top holder
top 10
$SFN5m · 3 bars · ETH per token
first
1.377e-9
last
1.422e-8
high seen
1.508e-8
low seen
1.091e-9

change+932.97%over the bars shown

Partial history. This series begins where our index window opened2026-08-05 17:29 UTC, not at this token's first trade. Highs and lows are the extremes WE measured, never all-time.

Prices are read from the sqrtPriceX96 of indexed Uniswap V4 swaps in a single pool (0x939f22…571331), in ETH per token. Other venues and other pools for the same token are not blended in — an averaged cross-pool price is a number that never traded.

Index last advanced 2026-08-07 20:53 UTC.

trade $SFN
1.00% fee
max slippage
simulating…

Routed through Uniswap's router on Robinhood Chain. Simulations describe this block only — a contract can behave differently in the next one. Not advice; most new tokens on this chain go to zero.

what this scan could not determine
  • Parts of the pool-discovery window could not be read, so a V4 pool may have been missed.
  • No V2 or V3 pool exists, and no V4 pool was seen — but parts of the scan window were unreadable, so this is a blind spot, not a finding.
  • No Uniswap pool was found to simulate a buy or a sell against, so the trade simulation did not run.
  • Balance reads needed for the supply denominator did not all answer, so holder concentration was not measured rather than guessed.

These are on-chain measurements taken at 2026-08-07 20:54:57 UTC, not an audit and not advice. A token can change behaviour in the next block: liquidity can be pulled, and a contract can behave differently for you than for this simulation. We never accept payment to change what a scan says.

SYNCING