fletch_

$ANTILIQUID

Antiliquid
0xB4D2Fa012e9C7599Ae321EF4797e0f7518a02b89explorer ↗
No alarms from the checks we ran. That is not a clean bill of health — it means these specific checks found nothing, and every one of them can be defeated by a contract written to defeat it.
trades on
Uniswap V4 (1 pool)
sell simulation
quoted
top holder
—
top 10
—
$ANTILIQUID5m · 2 bars · ETH per token
first
2.838e-9
last
2.510e-9
high seen
3.620e-9
low seen
2.510e-9

change-11.55%over the bars shown

Partial history. This series begins where our index window opened — 2026-08-05 17:29 UTC, not at this token's first trade. Highs and lows are the extremes WE measured, never all-time.

Prices are read from the sqrtPriceX96 of indexed Uniswap V4 swaps in a single pool (0xabb6d7…cc96a6), in ETH per token. Other venues and other pools for the same token are not blended in — an averaged cross-pool price is a number that never traded.

Index last advanced 2026-08-07 20:26 UTC.

trade $ANTILIQUID
1.00% fee
max slippage
simulating…

Routed through Uniswap's router on Robinhood Chain. Simulations describe this block only — a contract can behave differently in the next one. Not advice; most new tokens on this chain go to zero.

Both a simulated buy and a simulated sell returned a quote at the time of this scan.
eth_call to the Uniswap V4 quoter in both directions. This says nothing about later blocks — a contract can change behaviour, and liquidity can be removed.
what this scan could not determine
  • — After subtracting pool liquidity and burned supply, nothing measurable remains — holder concentration was not computed.

These are on-chain measurements taken at 2026-08-07 20:26:32 UTC, not an audit and not advice. A token can change behaviour in the next block: liquidity can be pulled, and a contract can behave differently for you than for this simulation. We never accept payment to change what a scan says.

scan anotherread the contract ↗
SYNCING