fletch_

$FIF

FROGINFIRE
0x81bcffA2262FBD0Df9e862f3091980853c1c432Bexplorer ↗
No alarms from the checks we ran. That is not a clean bill of health — it means these specific checks found nothing, and every one of them can be defeated by a contract written to defeat it.
trades on
none in scanned window
sell simulation
not run
top holder
top 10
$FIF5m · 3 bars · ETH per token
first
2.670e-9
last
2.519e-9
high seen
5.205e-9
low seen
2.519e-9

change-5.63%over the bars shown

Partial history. This series begins where our index window opened2026-08-05 17:29 UTC, not at this token's first trade. Highs and lows are the extremes WE measured, never all-time.

Prices are read from the sqrtPriceX96 of indexed Uniswap V4 swaps in a single pool (0xa8a864…07bb32), in ETH per token. Other venues and other pools for the same token are not blended in — an averaged cross-pool price is a number that never traded.

Index last advanced 2026-08-07 12:08 UTC.

trade $FIF
1.00% fee
max slippage
simulating…

Routed through Uniswap's router on Robinhood Chain. Simulations describe this block only — a contract can behave differently in the next one. Not advice; most new tokens on this chain go to zero.

what this scan could not determine
  • No V2 or V3 pool exists, and no V4 pool was created in the last 120,000 blocks (about 3.3 hours) that this scan walked — a V4 pool created earlier would not be seen.
  • No Uniswap pool was found to simulate a buy or a sell against, so the trade simulation did not run.
  • Balance reads needed for the supply denominator did not all answer, so holder concentration was not measured rather than guessed.

These are on-chain measurements taken at 2026-08-07 12:08:55 UTC, not an audit and not advice. A token can change behaviour in the next block: liquidity can be pulled, and a contract can behave differently for you than for this simulation. We never accept payment to change what a scan says.

SYNCING