$BPM

BPM Market

0x57464a50a33dD2164569fC0e82438f1a01acc23eexplorer ↗

No alarms from the checks we ran. That is not a clean bill of health — it means these specific checks found nothing, and every one of them can be defeated by a contract written to defeat it.

trades on

Uniswap V4 (1 pool)

sell simulation

quoted

top holder

—

top 10

—

$BPM5m · 2 bars · ETH per token

first: 3.096e-9
last: 2.518e-9
high seen: 6.694e-9
low seen: 2.518e-9

change-18.67%over the bars shown

Partial history. This series begins where our index window opened — 2026-08-05 17:29 UTC, not at this token's first trade. Highs and lows are the extremes WE measured, never all-time.

Prices are read from the sqrtPriceX96 of indexed Uniswap V4 swaps in a single pool (0x986a99…1ae9f6), in ETH per token. Other venues and other pools for the same token are not blended in — an averaged cross-pool price is a number that never traded.

Index last advanced 2026-08-07 20:23 UTC.

trade $BPM

1.00% fee

you pay (ETH)

max slippage

simulating…

Checking that what you would receive can be sold back through this pool…

Routed through Uniswap's router on Robinhood Chain. Simulations describe this block only — a contract can behave differently in the next one. Not advice; most new tokens on this chain go to zero.

Both a simulated buy and a simulated sell returned a quote at the time of this scan.

eth_call to the Uniswap V4 quoter in both directions. This says nothing about later blocks — a contract can change behaviour, and liquidity can be removed.

what this scan could not determine

— After subtracting pool liquidity and burned supply, nothing measurable remains — holder concentration was not computed.

These are on-chain measurements taken at 2026-08-07 20:25:21 UTC, not an audit and not advice. A token can change behaviour in the next block: liquidity can be pulled, and a contract can behave differently for you than for this simulation. We never accept payment to change what a scan says.

scan another read the contract ↗