reading the index
reading the index
labelled from the index's identity table · tickers are not unique on this chain; the address is the identity.
Aggregate, not a trade log: running totals for this wallet in this token, not a list of trades: the index is keyed (token, wallet) and stores no per-swap row, so there is no history to show and none is invented here. Every figure covers only swaps the chainwide index attributed to this address as the transaction signer since it opened 3d ago, so all of them are floors.
No swap of $AFK landed in an ETH-quoted pool inside the board's 24-hour pricing window, so there is no board price to mark against. The /chain board shows no price for it either. Not a claim that the balance is worth nothing — a disclosed absence of a price.
No swaps for this token were indexed in the window we queried — from 2026-08-07 18:55 UTC to now. That is a fact about the window, not about the token: it may have traded before that, before the index started, or on a venue this walker does not cover.
Partial history. This series begins where our index window opened — 2026-08-05 17:29 UTC, not at this token's first trade. Highs and lows are the extremes WE measured, never all-time.
Prices are read from the sqrtPriceX96 of indexed Uniswap V4 swaps in a single pool, in ETH per token. Other venues and other pools for the same token are not blended in — an averaged cross-pool price is a number that never traded.
This is $AFK's price, not this address's trades. Nothing on it marks where the 2 witnessed swaps happened — the index stores running totals and no per-swap row, so there is no point on this axis to draw.
Three measurements, kept apart on purpose. Balance is read from the token contract while you wait — a live fact, or an admitted failure, never a zero we assumed. Value at mark is that balance at the board's last-trade price: paper, and from one pool. Witnessed flow is ETH out minus ETH in across the swaps the chainwide index attributed to this address since its window opened — a floor, because attribution starts at the transaction signer and a trade routed through an aggregator is recorded against the router. No profit figure appears anywhere on this page. we have not witnessed a buy of this token by this wallet with both its ETH and its token amount recorded, so there is no cost per token to state a profit against; adding the bag's value to the witnessed flow would price whatever was bought before the window — or arrived by transfer, or was bought through a router — at zero, and print that as gain. Unknown is not zero, so no number is printed at all. Proceeds quoted in WETH count as ETH, since the wrapper redeems 1:1. Not advice.