reading the index
reading the index
No balance was found in the 150 tokens we checked, and no trades by this wallet were witnessed since the index window opened. 38 balance reads did not answer, so this is not a complete answer — a position could be sitting in one of them. Tokens outside the checked slice were not looked at.
reading the trade index…
38 of the 150 scanned balance reads did not answer. Those tokens are missing from the table above — that is a gap in our read, not evidence this wallet holds none of them. Reload in a minute.
Two value measurements, on purpose. Value marks each bag at the last stored 5-minute close of the pool the /chain board prices that token from — the same number the board shows, and a paper one: a thin pool can print a price no exit would realise. Sell quote is what a sale of the entire balance quoted at just now through one pool, price impact included, before our fee and before gas. Where they disagree, the gap is the liquidity. Witnessed flow is the third measurement and a separate one: ETH out minus ETH in across swaps the chainwide index saw since its window opened, attributed to the swap sender — a trade routed through an aggregator is recorded against the router, not this wallet, so every flow figure is a floor. No PnL is shown anywhere on this page. The index records the ETH a swap moved, not how many tokens it moved, so there is no cost per token to state a profit against; adding a bag's value to a witnessed flow would price whatever was bought before the window — or arrived by transfer, or was bought through a router — at zero, and print that as gain. Unknown is not zero, so no number is printed at all. Proceeds quoted in WETH are counted as ETH, since the wrapper redeems 1:1. Tokens the index has never seen trade are not checked at all. Not advice.
No swap by this wallet was attributed to it since the index window opened 2d ago. Attribution starts at the signer, so a trade routed through an aggregator is recorded against the router instead — this is a statement about our coverage, not about whether this address trades.
one line per TOKEN, not per trade: the index stores running totals per (token, wallet), so there is no per-swap history to show and none is invented here.